Playing the national anthem as part of a medley can break the law in Massachusetts. Yes, you read that right.
The rule is written down, with a fine attached, and nobody seems to have erased it.
That one sent me down a rabbit hole. I found statutes about mules on upper floors, scared pigeons, and dyed baby chicks.
They read like jokes, but they sit in the official state code.
Then the internet makes things messier. Plenty of viral lists claim you can’t snore with your windows open or eat a fourth sandwich at a wake.
I love a good weird law, but I love the truth more.
So I sorted the real ones from the tall tales. Some will make you laugh, and a few will make you double-check your next playlist.
Can you guess which ones are fake before you scroll?
1. No Selling Dyed Chicks Or Bunnies
Pastel baby chicks once showed up around Easter as cute novelty gifts. Massachusetts decided that trend needed a firm no.
The state has a law against selling, trading, displaying, or giving away rabbits, chicks, ducklings, and other fowl that have been artificially colored.
So a pink bunny or lime green duckling might look adorable, but offering one as a holiday gift can cross a legal line.
And the rules don’t stop with colorful animals.
Massachusetts also restricts selling or giving away live baby chicks, ducklings, and other young birds under two months old, with certain exceptions.
Why all the fuss? Dyed animals were often purchased on impulse around Easter, only to lose their novelty once the holiday passed.
The law makes room for legitimate farming and educational activities. Breeders and stores can sell young birds for commercial breeding and raising, while schools have an exception for classroom instruction.
There’s even a surprisingly specific detail about ducklings. Those sold before May 1 must be purchased in groups of at least 24.
Apparently, lawmakers wanted to make sure baby ducks weren’t treated like individual Easter decorations.
Breaking the rule can bring a fine of up to one hundred dollars. That’s enough to make someone reconsider turning a baby animal into a colorful holiday surprise.
If you’re planning an Easter celebration, chocolate bunnies and stuffed chicks are much easier choices.
And if you’re genuinely interested in raising chickens, it’s worth learning about their care, space requirements, and local regulations first.
These animals can live for years, long after the Easter baskets have been packed away.
Honestly, this is one of those strange Massachusetts laws that makes more sense the longer you think about it.
Kindness to animals never goes out of style.
2. No Star-Spangled Banner Medleys
Your wedding DJ might want to skip that clever anthem remix. Massachusetts has a law about exactly how the Star-Spangled Banner gets performed.
The rule lives in Chapter 264, Section 9 of the Massachusetts General Laws. It applies in public places, theaters, movie halls, restaurants, cafés, and public entertainment.
In those spots, the anthem must be played as a whole and separate piece. You can’t mash it up with other tunes or tack on fancy extra melodies.
The law also forbids using it as dance music. It can’t serve as an exit march or appear as part of a medley either.
The statute prescribes a fine of up to one hundred dollars for prohibited performances. However, the fact that this old law remains in the code doesn’t establish that its restrictions would survive a modern First Amendment challenge.
Why so strict? Lawmakers clearly wanted the song treated with respect, not as background noise for a party.
Private sing-alongs in your living room aren’t the target here. The listed places are public ones, like restaurants and theaters.
The funny part is how modern music works today. Remixes, samples, and mashups are common, so this rule feels like a time capsule.
For modern performers, the law is an unusual reminder of how seriously Massachusetts once regulated public performances of the anthem.
Performers can still sing it with feeling and personality. The law is about keeping it separate, not about making it boring.
Sports fans will notice the anthem usually stands alone before games anyway. That tradition happens to line up nicely with what this law asks.
So the next time someone suggests an anthem remix, you’ve got an unusual piece of Massachusetts history to share. The restriction remains written into state law, even if its modern enforceability is questionable.
3. No Spitting On Sidewalks
Gross habits and good laws sometimes go hand in hand. Massachusetts actually puts a price tag on spitting in public.
Chapter 270, Section 14 sits under crimes against public health. It covers spitting on public sidewalks and places used mostly by people on foot.
The rule reaches inside too. Certain public buildings and public transportation are included, unless you use a proper receptacle.
A receptacle, in old-school terms, means something like a spittoon. Yes, the law still nods to a container most people have only seen in cowboy movies.
Subway riders, take note. Public transportation counts, so the platform and the train car are not your personal spittoon.
The fine tops out at twenty dollars. That might be the cheapest penalty on this list, but it still counts.
Why did lawmakers bother? Back when diseases like tuberculosis spread easily, public spitting was seen as a serious health risk.
The idea still holds up pretty well today. Nobody wants to step around a surprise on the way to the train.
Runners and athletes might feel a little called out here. A quick spit on a busy sidewalk technically falls under this statute.
The easy fix is simple manners. Use a tissue, find a trash can, or step off to a spot that isn’t a walkway.
Enforcement is probably rare, so don’t expect police to patrol for spitters. Still, the rule gives cities a tool when things get truly out of hand.
It’s also a reminder that weird old laws often came from real problems. Somebody once looked at a sidewalk and said, enough.
Kids learn this rule from parents long before they learn it from a lawbook. Massachusetts just wrote it down officially.
Think of it as the state asking you to keep shared spaces pleasant. Twenty dollars is a small price, but a clean sidewalk is priceless.
4. Dueling Bans
Pistols at dawn may sound like a scene from a history movie. Massachusetts has been banning duels since at least 1719.
That’s more than three hundred years of saying no to settling arguments with weapons. Some of those rules still show up in state law today.
One statute has an especially unusual twist. It applies to Massachusetts residents who arrange a duel in the state, fight it elsewhere, and inflict a fatal wound on someone who later dies back in Massachusetts.
Under Chapter 265, Section 3, the person who inflicted the fatal wound can face a murder charge in Massachusetts. Another section addresses someone who served as a second in the duel.
Military members get their own rules too. The Massachusetts Code of Military Justice covers anyone who fights, promotes, or is involved in a duel.
Even knowing about a challenge and staying quiet can get someone in trouble. Under that code, a court-martial decides the punishment.
Why keep these laws around? Dueling was once tied to honor, and banning it helped push disputes into courtrooms instead.
The idea of a formal duel seems wildly old-fashioned now. Still, the laws remain a reminder that the state took the problem seriously.
History buffs will love that the 1719 date predates the United States itself. Massachusetts was still a colony when this fight began.
Some famous Americans did duel, of course. The Hamilton and Burr showdown happened in New Jersey, not here.
So how does this help you today? It’s a great conversation starter, and it’s a gentle reminder that arguments are best solved with words.
It’s almost hard to imagine a time when a personal insult could lead to an arranged fight with deadly consequences. That’s what makes these old dueling laws such a fascinating reminder of how attitudes toward honor and justice have changed.
Nobody needs a glove slap or ten paces in the backyard. Massachusetts made that call centuries ago, and it still seems wise.
5. No Frightening Pigeons
Scaring a pigeon hardly sounds like something lawmakers would worry about. Yet Massachusetts has a law about frightening these birds, and the details are far more specific than you might expect.
Chapter 266, Section 132 deals with pigeons around specially prepared areas used to catch them in nets. The law prohibits deliberately killing or frightening the birds away from those spots under certain circumstances.
Picture someone carefully setting up nets to catch pigeons, only to have another person deliberately scare the entire flock away. All that preparation would go to waste in seconds.
Suddenly, a law about frightened pigeons doesn’t sound quite so random.
Here’s where things get interesting. The rule doesn’t cover every pigeon wandering through a city square.
It applies to particular trapping areas, which makes the popular internet version pretty misleading.
The statute even specifies a distance of 100 rods. That’s roughly 1,650 feet, or more than five football fields laid end to end.
Quite a lot of detail for a rule most people have never heard of.
There’s another important exception. The law recognizes certain rights of people acting on their own land, so it isn’t a blanket ban on disturbing pigeons.
And the penalty? Violating the statute can mean a fine of up to twenty dollars or as much as a month in jail.
That’s a surprisingly serious consequence for something that sounds so harmless.
Today, the rule feels like a curious leftover from another era, when catching pigeons was common enough to deserve legal attention.
So the next time someone insists Massachusetts made it illegal to scare pigeons, you can tell them there’s a little truth behind the story.
The real law is simply much more specific than the version floating around online.
6. No Mules On The Second Floor
Your upstairs neighbor stomping around is annoying enough. Now swap that neighbor for a mule.
Massachusetts actually has a law about keeping horses and mules on upper floors of buildings. Yes, lawmakers had to consider what happens when a thousand-pound animal lives upstairs.
Chapter 272, Section 86 of the Massachusetts General Laws addresses this unusual situation. Outside cities, stabling these animals on the second floor or higher requires specific safety measures.
The building must have exits at opposite ends leading to ground level or an automatic sprinkler system. Cities have their own stable-safety requirements.
That exit detail tells you plenty. Imagine trying to guide a frightened mule down a narrow staircase while smoke fills the building.
Not exactly a situation anyone wants to handle.
The law makes more sense when you consider how buildings were once used. Older stables sometimes had multiple floors, with storage areas and animal stalls sharing the available space.
Horses can weigh well over a thousand pounds, too. Keeping animals that large upstairs brings challenges that go far beyond noisy footsteps.
And fire wasn’t the only concern. Moving a nervous animal through tight spaces could be difficult even on an ordinary day.
Today, most horses and mules live in ground-level barns, so the rule probably doesn’t come up very often.
Still, it’s a fun piece of Massachusetts legal history. Ask someone to guess which state law involves mules, staircases, and sprinkler systems, and you’ll probably get some interesting answers.
What sounds like a ridiculous restriction actually reflects a practical concern about protecting animals and people during emergencies.
So no, you probably weren’t planning to move a mule upstairs. But Massachusetts lawmakers made sure there were rules for anyone who did.
7. The Blasphemy Law
Some old rules feel like they belong in a museum. Massachusetts still keeps a blasphemy law in Chapter 272, Section 36.
The law targets speech that mocks or insults God and certain religious beliefs. On paper, it can carry a fine or even jail time.
The most famous case happened in the 1830s. A Boston writer named Abner Kneeland was convicted and served time in jail in 1838.
His case is often called the last blasphemy jailing in the country. Plenty of people at the time thought the punishment went too far.
Since then, courts have made free speech protections much stronger. The First Amendment makes this law very hard to enforce today.
So why is it still on the books? Repealing old laws takes time and votes, and lawmakers often have bigger issues on their plates.
That’s how a lot of oddball statutes survive. They aren’t really used, but nobody gets around to removing them.
Massachusetts isn’t alone here. A handful of other states have kept similar laws long after they stopped being used.
The takeaway for you is pretty interesting. A law being written down doesn’t always mean it can be enforced.
Courts can decide that old rules clash with the Constitution. When that happens, the words may stay, but their power fades.
History lovers can learn a lot from Kneeland’s story. It shows how the state wrestled with religion and free speech in its early years.
It also explains why your history teacher gets excited about the Bill of Rights. Those protections changed what governments could punish.
So feel free to discuss big ideas, ask hard questions, and disagree respectfully. That’s the spirit of free speech at its best.
8. Snoring With Open Windows
Snorers, relax. You can keep the window cracked tonight.
A popular viral claim says Massachusetts makes it illegal to snore unless your bedroom windows are shut and locked. It pops up on countless weird law lists.
The catch is that nobody seems able to point to an actual statute. Search the Massachusetts General Laws, and you won’t find a snoring section.
That’s the problem with many funny law lists. They copy from each other, and a joke slowly turns into a so-called fact.
The snoring rule may have started as a garbled version of a local noise ordinance. Many towns do have rules about loud noise at night.
Those rules usually target things like parties, leaf blowers, or barking dogs. Your nose whistling at 2 a.m. is not what they had in mind.
A police officer measuring snores outside a bedroom window? The image alone shows why this one sounds made up.
Still, the myth has staying power because it’s so relatable. Almost everyone knows a snorer who could rattle a window frame.
If that snorer is you, the real advice comes from doctors, not lawmakers. Loud, frequent snoring can sometimes signal sleep apnea, which deserves a checkup.
It’s easy to see why the story spread. The image of someone getting fined for snoring with an open window is just absurd enough to become memorable.
Neighbors in close apartments might appreciate a closed window anyway. That’s courtesy, though, not a legal requirement.
So the next time someone shares this one online, you can gently correct them. Tell them it’s a great story with no law behind it.
Honestly, the myth is still fun to share. Just make sure your friends know it lands in the folklore pile, not the lawbook.
9. Baths Only With A Doctor’s Note
A prescription for bubble bath sounds like the world’s best doctor visit. Sadly, it’s not a real Boston rule.
Lists of strange laws often claim that taking a bath in Boston requires a physician’s instructions. The story has circulated for years, and somehow, people keep believing it.
But here’s the catch. No current Boston ordinance or Massachusetts statute appears to support that claim.
So where did this strange idea come from?
Back in the 1800s, doctors sometimes recommended special baths as medical treatments. The practice was called hydrotherapy, and it was taken seriously.
A physician suggesting a warm soak wasn’t unusual. But somewhere along the way, that medical recommendation may have turned into a story about needing permission to bathe.
Quite a leap, right?
Boston’s actual history tells a different story. The city eventually established public bathhouses to make bathing more accessible, not to keep residents out of the tub.
Imagine how the supposed law would even work. Would police officers knock on bathroom doors asking to see a doctor’s note?
And what happens if someone forgets the paperwork but really needs a shower?
Fortunately, nobody has to worry about that.
Kids might wish the myth were true, especially when bath time interrupts their favorite game. But telling a parent that soap requires a prescription probably won’t get them very far.
The real story is less ridiculous and more interesting. It shows how an old medical practice can become a completely different tale after years of repetition.
And Boston has another bathing myth that’s just as strange. Apparently, some people believe the city once required everyone to wash before going to bed.
One imaginary law makes bathing difficult, while the other makes it mandatory.
Now that’s a pretty funny bathtub puzzle.
10. Bathe Before Bed
Here comes the other half of the bathtub puzzle. One myth says Boston requires a doctor’s note to bathe, and another insists you must wash before bed.
Apparently, the city just couldn’t make up its mind.
The second claim turns an ordinary bedtime routine into a legal obligation. Imagine getting fined because you were too tired to take a shower.
Fortunately, Boston has no current ordinance requiring residents to bathe before going to sleep. The supposed rule belongs on a trivia list, not in the city’s lawbooks.
So why do people keep repeating it?
Maybe because bedtime rules sound like something a particularly strict parent would invent. Somewhere along the way, that imaginary household rule seems to have become an imaginary city law.
Funny enough, the idea of bathing before bed isn’t entirely without merit.
Some sleep experts recommend taking a warm bath or shower an hour or two before bedtime. Warm water temporarily raises your body temperature, and the cooling that follows may help you fall asleep.
That’s a pretty good reason to fill the tub, even without a law telling you to.
Still, your nightly routine is entirely your business. Shower in the morning, take a bath at night, or skip the evening soak when you’re exhausted.
Nobody is waiting outside your bathroom with a ticket book.
Parents might find the myth useful, though. Telling kids that bedtime baths are required by law could make an interesting argument when everyone starts protesting.
Just don’t be surprised when someone asks to see the rule.
And that’s what makes this story entertaining. A perfectly ordinary habit somehow became one of Boston’s strangest supposed legal requirements.
So enjoy your bedtime bath if you like. The law certainly isn’t making you.
11. Three Sandwiches At A Wake
Grief and food go together in many New England families. So the claim that Massachusetts caps wake sandwiches at three gets people talking.
The story says mourners can’t eat more than three sandwiches at a wake. It shows up on lots of lists of strange state laws.
Despite its fame, no Massachusetts statute sets a sandwich limit. You won’t find one in the General Laws, and no court enforces a fourth-sandwich ban.
So where did it come from? Nobody knows for sure, but it may have started as a joke about guests who linger at the buffet.
The myth works because it feels oddly specific. Three is a believable number, and wakes often include trays of finger sandwiches.
There’s a sweet side to the story, too. Food at a wake is about comfort and gathering, not counting bites.
If you’re attending one, a little etiquette goes a long way. Take a reasonable plate and leave enough for others who arrive later.
Bringing something can be a kind gesture as well. A casserole, cookies, or a fruit tray for the family’s home is often appreciated.
Think of the three-sandwich rule as friendly advice dressed up as law. It’s basically a polite reminder not to empty the platter.
Funny laws like this one also show how humor helps people handle hard moments. A small joke can lighten a heavy day.
It’s easy to understand why a claim this oddly specific keeps circulating. But no matter how often it appears on strange-law lists, Massachusetts has no legal limit on funeral sandwiches.
So go ahead and enjoy that fourth sandwich if you’re hungry. Just maybe wait until the line has thinned out.
12. No Tomatoes In Clam Chowder
Few food fights in New England get as heated as the chowder debate. Creamy white chowder is the local favorite, and tomato-based Manhattan style gets plenty of side-eye.
A popular claim says putting tomatoes in clam chowder is illegal in Massachusetts. It’s a great story, but there’s no such state law.
The tale likely borrows from a famous moment next door. In 1939, a Maine legislator named Cleveland Sleeper reportedly introduced a bill to ban tomatoes in chowder.
That bill didn’t become law, but the legend stuck. Over time, many lists moved the story to Massachusetts.
Honestly, the confusion makes sense. New England clam chowder is so tied to the region that people assume it must be protected by law.
The classic version uses clams, potatoes, onions, and a creamy base, often with salt pork or bacon. Manhattan chowder swaps the cream for a tomato broth.
Rhode Island adds yet another twist with a clear broth version. So the region itself can’t fully agree on one recipe.
Some chowder fans even treat the topic like a sports rivalry. Red versus white can spark more passion than you’d expect from soup.
Want to try the tomato style at home? Go for it, because no officer will knock on your kitchen door.
Just be ready for some teasing at the dinner table. Food loyalty runs deep in this part of the country.
If you’re visiting, ordering a cup of the creamy kind is an easy way to taste local tradition. Plenty of seafood spots serve it, especially near the coast.
The myth sticks around because it captures real local pride. Lawmakers didn’t ban tomatoes, but plenty of cooks did it for them.
13. Gorillas Must Ride Up Front
Driving with a gorilla is already a bold choice. The myth says Massachusetts makes it ride shotgun.
According to this widely shared claim, a gorilla can’t sit in the back seat of a car. It has to ride up front.
Sounds ridiculous, right? That’s because no Massachusetts statute says anything of the sort.
The story appears on strange-law lists for several states, which is a pretty good clue that something isn’t right. When the same bizarre rule keeps popping up in different places, folklore is usually involved.
Owning a gorilla would be a much bigger legal problem anyway. Massachusetts has strict rules about exotic animals, and keeping great apes as ordinary household pets isn’t allowed.
So worrying about which seat your gorilla should occupy is getting ahead of yourself.
Zoos and wildlife professionals transport these powerful animals in specialized crates, not ordinary passenger cars. A full-grown gorilla can weigh hundreds of pounds, making the idea of sharing a front seat even more absurd.
Still, picture the looks you’d get at a stoplight with a gorilla sitting beside you.
Would the other drivers stare? Would anyone even believe what they were seeing?
Of all the strange laws people attribute to Massachusetts, this might be one of the hardest to explain with a straight face.
And that’s probably why the story keeps showing up on trivia lists. It’s so ridiculous that people remember it, even when nobody can produce the actual law.
So if someone tells you Massachusetts requires gorillas to ride in the front seat, you’ve got your answer.
The only place that rule belongs is in the imagination.
14. No Fiddling In Boston
Boston has a long love affair with Irish and folk music. So a rule banning the fiddle would be wildly out of tune with the city.
Strange law lists often claim it’s illegal to play the fiddle in Boston. The claim gets repeated a lot, but it doesn’t hold up.
There’s no current Boston ordinance banning fiddles. Musicians play them in restaurants, concert halls, and on street corners around the city.
Boston is also home to Berklee College of Music, which offers string programs. The city’s music scene would look very different without fiddles.
So why does the myth exist? It may come from old concerns about noise, street performers, or Puritan-era attitudes toward entertainment.
The Puritans who settled the area were famously strict about many pastimes. It’s easy to see how a legend about banned music could grow from that reputation.
Many cities, including Boston, set guidelines for street performers. Those rules usually cover where and how buskers can play in public spaces.
They tend to focus on things like noise, blocking walkways, and permits. They’re about keeping public spaces usable, not about picking on one instrument.
If you play, Boston is a fantastic place to share your music. Check local rules before setting up on a sidewalk or plaza.
Listeners win too. Plenty of free outdoor concerts and community performances pop up around the city in the summer months.
Massachusetts as a whole has deep folk traditions too. Contra dancing, often played with fiddles, still draws crowds in communities across the state.
So tune up and bow away without fear. The only thing a fiddle might break in Boston is a crowd’s silence.
15. A License To Wear A Goatee
According to the story, anyone wanting to wear a goatee in public must first purchase a license. Some versions place the rule in Boston, while others point to Fitchburg.
Sounds like a pretty expensive way to grow a little chin hair.
Fortunately, there’s no evidence of such a requirement in current Massachusetts law. Beards, mustaches, and goatees don’t need government approval.
Some versions claim the rule originated as an attempt to discourage rebellious facial hair. It’s an entertaining explanation, but nobody seems able to produce the actual law.
And that’s where the story falls apart.
Imagine how enforcement would work. Would barbers need to check licenses before trimming someone’s beard?
Would police officers carry measuring tapes to inspect suspicious-looking chins?
Fitchburg barbers can relax. There’s no city license standing between their customers and a fresh goatee.
Facial hair has certainly carried cultural meaning throughout history. Different styles have represented everything from fashion and status to rebellion, which might help explain why this particular legend sounds believable.
But Massachusetts residents are free to choose their facial hair without applying for special permission.
Workplaces may have grooming requirements, especially when protective equipment is involved. That’s a different matter entirely.
The next time someone insists the goatee license is real, ask them to show you the statute. Chances are, they’ll find another strange-law list instead.
And that’s a fitting way to end our trip through Massachusetts legal oddities. Some genuinely strange laws remain on the books, while others survive only because they’re too funny to forget.
Your goatee, thankfully, belongs to the second category.
Share this story
